In China, A Link Between Happiness & Air Quality

January 22, 2019 |

This article was originally published on MIT News.

“For many years, China has been struggling to tackle high pollution levels that are crippling its major cities. Indeed, a recent study by researchers at Chinese Hong Kong University has found that air pollution in the country causes an average of 1.1 million premature deaths each year and costs its economy $38 billion.

Now researchers at MIT have discovered that air pollution in China’s cities may be contributing to low levels of happiness amongst the country’s urban population.

In a paper published today in the journal Nature Human Behaviour, a research team led by Siqi Zheng, the Samuel Tak Lee Associate Professor in MIT’s Department of Urban Studies and Planning and Center for Real Estate, and the Faculty Director of MIT China Future City Lab, reveals that higher levels of pollution are associated with a decrease in people’s happiness levels.

The paper also includes co-first author Jianghao Wang of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Matthew Kahn of the University of Southern California, Cong Sun of the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, and Xiaonan Zhang of Tsinghua University in Beijing. Despite an annual economic growth rate of 8 percent, satisfaction levels amongst China’s urban population have not risen as much as would be expected…”

Read on at: MIT News.

Related articles

Human Capital, Social Capital

Launching the Social & Human Capital Protocol: A Primer for Business

November 26, 2021 | Livelihoods, Social & Human Capital, Wellbeing

Integrated Capitals

Insights from Our UN Food Systems Summit Pre-summit Dialogue

August 16, 2021 | Climate Change, Decision Making, Ecosystem Services, Food Security, Measure & Value, Nature-based Solutions, Wellbeing

Integrated Capitals

IPBES & IPCC: Tackling Biodiversity & Climate Crises Together & Their Combined Social Impacts

June 18, 2021 | Biodiversity, Climate Change, Ecosystem Services, Livelihoods, Nature Loss, Wellbeing

Natural Capital

UK Government Responds to Dasgupta Review on the Economics of Biodiversity

June 15, 2021 | Biodiversity, Decision Making, Economy, Ecosystem Services, Wellbeing

Natural Capital

G7 Nations Announce ‘Nature Compact’

June 13, 2021 | Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, Health, Livelihoods

Natural Capital

Nature Positive by 2030: #TheRaceIsOn

June 5, 2021 | Biodiversity, Climate Change, Ecosystems, Nature Loss, Nature-based Solutions, Wellbeing

Natural Capital

Beyond GDP – United Nations Adopts New SEEA Ecosystem Accounting Standard, By Carl Obst & Alessandra Alfieri

June 2, 2021 | Decision Making, Economy, Ecosystem Services, Impacts & Dependencies, Livelihoods, Measure & Value, Sustainable Development Goals, Wellbeing

Integrated Capitals

G7 Minister’s Communiqué Calls for Equitable, Nature Positive & Carbon Neutral Pathway

May 24, 2021 | Biodiversity, Climate Change, Restoration, Wellbeing

Integrated Capitals

Practical Guide Helps Negotiators Put Equity at Heart of New Global Biodiversity Framework

May 21, 2021 | Biodiversity, Community, Indigenous Peoples, Nature Loss, Wellbeing

Human Capital, Natural Capital

We Need A New Social Contract For Our Global Commons, by Naoko Ishii

May 18, 2021 | Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, Impacts & Dependencies, Indigenous Peoples, Land Use, Livelihoods, Wellbeing

Integrated Capitals

Plural Valuation of Nature Matters for Environmental Sustainability & Justice

May 15, 2021 | Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, Measure & Value, Wellbeing

Benefit from the Coalition’s unique overview of the capitals approach and community, gain insights into the latest thinking and developments and receive newsletters and project updates.

Introduction from Carl Obst (2017)

Victor Hugo once wrote that “Nothing is so powerful as an idea whose time has come”. Recognising the true value of natural capital, is one such idea. Across private and public sectors, across disciplines, and around the world, initiatives to advance and develop natural capital thinking have emerged rapidly over the past 10 years.

In a blizzard of acronyms, we have the NCC, SEEA, WAVES, IIRC, KIP-INCA, A4S, GRI, EO4EA – among many others. Are they the same, are they competing, are they useful? To both insiders and outsiders this range of initiatives is confusing at best. At worst, it leads to a lack of engagement, avoidance and misunderstanding.

The reality is that, while differences among these various initiatives do exist, they have all been motivated by a common understanding of the reality that we are losing our stocks of natural capital – and that this matters.

While each initiative may have different origins, some differing objectives, and may reflect variations in technique and method, there is much common ground. Indeed, to engage the broader community in tackling the natural capital challenges we collectively face, we cannot afford to focus on distinctions. Instead, we must look to build on the overlaps and seek to build a common language that will enable the exchange of ideas and ongoing innovation.

It is in this spirit of collaboration that the Natural Capital Coalition, together with the IDEEA Group and supported by over 20 organisations, launches this statement on Combining Forces on Natural Capital.

It is especially relevant that this statement of collaboration is launched at the World Forum on Natural Capital, where leading voices in the movement gather every two years, to share best practice, enduring challenges and build further collaborations.

While progress to date has largely taken place in small pockets, in order to move forward we need to ramp up our efforts and move beyond talking with supporters and “the converted”.

For this, we need leaders who can establish spaces for dialogue and development, and who can ensure that technical debates do not form a barrier to progress, that we take full advantage of the diversity of skills and experience already engaged, and that the big picture is always kept in mind.

I encourage you to take the opportunity to read the statement, to share it within your organisations, to sign on, and to join us as we move towards a better understanding and appreciation of the complex and beautiful world in which we live.

Carl Obst is Director of the Institute for the Development of Environmental-Economic Accounting (IDEEA Group), and Lead Author of the United Nation’s System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (UN SEEA).