Translating Green Infrastructure Research into Decision Making & Practice

June 07, 2017 |

This report is a product of Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.

Story highlights:

Feasibility, costs and benefits are the top three factors influencing decisions. Respondents did not explicitly refer to “evidence” or research”, but their need is implied.
Responses on the link between evidence availability and decision making were quite diverse. Investment happens on a case by case basis, because or despite of having enough evidence. Often GI investment is limited due to lack of evidence.
Five types of evidence are most likely to have an impact on decision making. These are searchable databases (containing short facts or evidence statements or resources such as case studies of guidance documents), local quantitative or qualitative case studies, reviews of evidence, best practice documents and tools applicable at the local authority level.

“The Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) has over recent years promoted research in Green Infrastructure. A recent call for a Knowledge Exchange Fellow for urban Green Infrastructure was opened in March 2017.

I launched a survey in prepartion of my bid for this call. I would like to share the outcomes of the survey with a wider audience of Green Infrastructure practitioners, decision makers and policy makers. Thanks to all who participated in the survey.

The full report can be downloaded here.

Stakeholders said lack of time, doubt over quality or reliability of evidence and lack of evidence on economic benefits are the top barriers. Lack of evidence generally and political prioritisation also play a role…”

Read on and access the report at: Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.

Related articles

Integrated Capitals

Capitals Coalition Announces Joining of SELINA and SUSTAIN EU Projects

October 25, 2022 | Data, Decision Making, Measure & Value

Natural Capital

Capitals Coalition Announces Plans to Develop Global Value Commission

May 23, 2022 | Data, Decision Making, Impacts & Dependencies, Measure & Value

Integrated Capitals

Capitals Coalition to Host ‘Digitalizing Sustainability Data’ Project

April 26, 2022 | Data, Decision Making, Measure & Value

Natural Capital

Capitals Coalition Joins TNFD as Key Knowledge Partner

January 25, 2022 | Biodiversity, Data, Decision Making, Impacts & Dependencies, Measure & Value

Integrated Capitals

Mark Gough: Address Nature in the Accounts or There Will Be No Planet

November 5, 2021 | Climate Change, Data, Decision Making, Measure & Value, Nature Loss

Integrated Capitals, Natural Capital

New Online Business Training Course on Social and Human Capital to Launch

February 21, 2023 | Business, Decision Making, Social & Human Capital

Integrated Capitals, Natural Capital

ACT-D Case Studies Demonstrating Business Action for Nature

January 19, 2023 | Business, Decision Making, Natural Capital

Natural Capital

More Than 330 Businesses Call on Heads of State to Make Nature Assessment and Disclosure Mandatory at COP15

October 26, 2022 | Business, Decision Making, Measure & Value

Natural Capital

Express Your Interest in Joining Our COP15 Business Delegation

September 6, 2022 | Biodiversity, Decision Making, Measure & Value

Natural Capital

#MakeItMandatory: Join Businesses Around the World Calling for Mandatory Assessment & Disclosure on Nature

September 6, 2022 | Biodiversity, Decision Making, Impacts & Dependencies, Measure & Value

Integrated Capitals

Announcing Two New Capitals Hubs

July 25, 2022 | Decision Making, Measure & Value

Integrated Capitals

Value Commission: Apply to be a Commissioner

July 8, 2022 | Decision Making, Measure & Value

Benefit from the Coalition’s unique overview of the capitals approach and community, gain insights into the latest thinking and developments and receive newsletters and project updates.

Introduction from Carl Obst (2017)

Victor Hugo once wrote that “Nothing is so powerful as an idea whose time has come”. Recognising the true value of natural capital, is one such idea. Across private and public sectors, across disciplines, and around the world, initiatives to advance and develop natural capital thinking have emerged rapidly over the past 10 years.

In a blizzard of acronyms, we have the NCC, SEEA, WAVES, IIRC, KIP-INCA, A4S, GRI, EO4EA – among many others. Are they the same, are they competing, are they useful? To both insiders and outsiders this range of initiatives is confusing at best. At worst, it leads to a lack of engagement, avoidance and misunderstanding.

The reality is that, while differences among these various initiatives do exist, they have all been motivated by a common understanding of the reality that we are losing our stocks of natural capital – and that this matters.

While each initiative may have different origins, some differing objectives, and may reflect variations in technique and method, there is much common ground. Indeed, to engage the broader community in tackling the natural capital challenges we collectively face, we cannot afford to focus on distinctions. Instead, we must look to build on the overlaps and seek to build a common language that will enable the exchange of ideas and ongoing innovation.

It is in this spirit of collaboration that the Natural Capital Coalition, together with the IDEEA Group and supported by over 20 organisations, launches this statement on Combining Forces on Natural Capital.

It is especially relevant that this statement of collaboration is launched at the World Forum on Natural Capital, where leading voices in the movement gather every two years, to share best practice, enduring challenges and build further collaborations.

While progress to date has largely taken place in small pockets, in order to move forward we need to ramp up our efforts and move beyond talking with supporters and “the converted”.

For this, we need leaders who can establish spaces for dialogue and development, and who can ensure that technical debates do not form a barrier to progress, that we take full advantage of the diversity of skills and experience already engaged, and that the big picture is always kept in mind.

I encourage you to take the opportunity to read the statement, to share it within your organisations, to sign on, and to join us as we move towards a better understanding and appreciation of the complex and beautiful world in which we live.

Carl Obst is Director of the Institute for the Development of Environmental-Economic Accounting (IDEEA Group), and Lead Author of the United Nation’s System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (UN SEEA).